Outdated file transfer methods like FTP, email attachments and custom scripts create a chaotic, insecure mess. Learn why a unified MFT solution is the key to taming your data transfer beast.
Picture this: It’s a dark and stormy night in your data center. Lightning flashes, illuminating a ghastly figure cobbled together from bits of FTP servers, email attachments and hastily written scripts. This monstrosity lurches from task to task, leaving a trail of security vulnerabilities and compliance nightmares in its wake. Sound familiar? If your organization is still relying on a hodgepodge of outdated file transfer methods, you might be the unwitting creator of a File Transfer Frankenstein.
Let’s dissect this beast and see why it’s time to retire your monstrous creation in favor of a more… shall we say, evolved solution.
Ah, FTP servers. The skeletal structure of many a file transfer system, held together with the duct tape of nostalgia and the rusty nails of “but we’ve always done it this way.” Sure, FTP might seem like a trusty old friend, but let’s be real—it’s about as secure as a screen door on a submarine.
Plain text passwords: FTP sends credentials in clear text. Here’s what that looks like on the wire:
USER username
331 Password required for username
PASS mySecretPassword123
230 User username logged in
Any packet sniffer can easily intercept these credentials.
No encryption: FTP transfers data in clear text too. Here’s a snippet of what an intercepted file transfer might look like:
150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for secret_financial_report.txt
This is confidential financial information...
226 Transfer complete
This is the equivalent of leaving your front door wide open for curious interlopers and malicious criminals.
Lack of visibility: FTP doesn’t provide built-in logging or auditing capabilities. Want to know who accessed what file and when? Good luck piecing that together from server logs and hoping nobody has tampered with them.
Ah, the tried-and-true method of attaching files to emails. It’s like trying to deliver packages by strapping them to carrier pigeons—quaint, unreliable and woefully inadequate for modern needs.
Size limitations: Most email servers limit attachment sizes to around 10-25 MB. Need to send a 1 GB file? Hope you enjoy splitting it into chunks and praying they all arrive intact.
Zero traceability: Email doesn’t provide any built-in way to track file access or changes. Here’s a common scenario:
From: you@company.com
To: colleague@company.com, external_partner@otherfirm.com
Subject: Confidential Project X Files
Attachment: project_x_specs.pdf
Hi all,
Please find attached the latest specs for Project X.
Once you hit send, you lose all control. Did the external partner forward it to their entire company? Did your colleague print it out and leave it on the copier? You’ll never know.
Security nightmare: Email attachments are often scanned for viruses, but they’re not encrypted by default. Plus, they often persist in multiple locations:
Each copy is a potential leak waiting to happen.
Custom scripts are the stitches holding your file transfer monster together. Sure, they might work… until they don’t. And when they fail, it’s like watching all those carefully sewn limbs fall off at once.
Here’s an example of a deceptively simple SFTP script:
import paramiko
import os
def transfer_file(hostname, username, password, local_path, remote_path):
try:
transport = paramiko.Transport((hostname, 22))
transport.connect(username=username, password=password)
sftp = paramiko.SFTPClient.from_transport(transport)
sftp.put(local_path, remote_path)
print(f"File {local_path} transferred successfully to {remote_path}!")
except Exception as e:
print(f"Error: {str(e)}")
finally:
if 'sftp' in locals():
sftp.close()
if 'transport' in locals():
transport.close()
# Usage
transfer_file('sftp.example.com', 'user', 'totally_secure_password', '/local/path/file.txt', '/remote/path/file.txt')
Looks simple, right? But let’s break down the issues:
APIs seem like a modern solution, but when cobbled together without a unified strategy, they’re just another patch on your Frankenstein. Let’s look at an example using a hypothetical cloud storage API:
import requests
import json
API_KEY = 'your_api_key_here'
BASE_URL = '<https://api.cloudprovider.com/v1>'
def upload_file(local_path, remote_path):
headers = {
'Authorization': f'Bearer {API_KEY}',
'Content-Type': 'application/octet-stream'
}
with open(local_path, 'rb') as file:
response = requests.put(f'{BASE_URL}/files/{remote_path}', headers=headers, data=file)
if response.status_code == 200:
print(f"File uploaded successfully to {remote_path}")
else:
print(f"Upload failed: {response.text}")
# Usage
upload_file('/local/path/file.txt', '/remote/path/file.txt')
This looks cleaner than our SFTP script, but it comes with its own set of problems:
cloudprovider.com
releases v2 of their API? You’ll need to update all your scripts and pray you don’t miss any.This patchwork approach to file transfer isn’t just ugly—it’s downright dangerous. Let’s count the ways:
Security vulnerabilities: With so many different methods, each with its own weaknesses, you’d need 24/7 visibility of every file transfer to maintain security over your data. A breach in any one system could compromise everything.
Compliance nightmares: Imagine explaining your “system” to auditors:
Auditor: "How do you verify all file transfers are encrypted?"
You: "Well, we use SFTP for some, but then there's email for the small stuff, and oh yeah, Dave in accounting still uses FTP because his ancient ERP system doesn't support anything else..."
Auditor: *facepalm*
Efficiency drain: Your IT team spends more time managing this monstrosity than actually innovating. Just look at the ticket backlog:
Visibility black holes: Tracking a file’s journey through this labyrinth? You’d have better luck finding a needle in a haystack… in the dark… underwater. There’s no centralized logging or monitoring, making troubleshooting a nightmare.
Scalability limits: As your data needs grow, your Frankenstein solution creaks and groans under the weight. That SFTP script that worked fine for 10 files a day falls apart when trying to handle 10,000.
It’s time to put your File Transfer Frankenstein to rest and embrace a solution that doesn’t belong in a horror story. Enter managed file transfer (MFT) solutions, like Progress MOVEit. Think of it as the suave, sophisticated descendant of your cobbled-together monster.
Progress MOVEit isn’t just an MFT solution; it’s the antidote to your file transfer woes. With MOVEit, you can:
Imagine a world where your file transfers are smoother, more secure and effortless. Where compliance is supported, and your IT team can focus on innovation instead of putting out fires. That’s the world MOVEit can help you create.
It’s time to lay your File Transfer Frankenstein to rest. Embrace the evolution of file transfer with a modern MFT solution like MOVEit. Your data—and your sanity—will thank you.
Ready to bring your file transfer into the modern age? Check out Progress MOVEit and see how easy it can be to tame the beast. Your data deserves better than a patchwork solution—give it the more secure, efficient home it deserves.
Adam Bertram is a 25+ year IT veteran and an experienced online business professional. He’s a successful blogger, consultant, 6x Microsoft MVP, trainer, published author and freelance writer for dozens of publications. For how-to tech tutorials, catch up with Adam at adamtheautomator.com, connect on LinkedIn or follow him on X at @adbertram.
Let our experts teach you how to use Sitefinity's best-in-class features to deliver compelling digital experiences.
Learn MoreSubscribe to get all the news, info and tutorials you need to build better business apps and sites